The model's whole claim is that content and its occurrences are different
things, and until now nothing in the editor could tell them apart: you could
make a drawing and time it, but not expose one drawing twice, and so never find
out whether an edit arrives in two places. That is the first proof obligation in
the lane model and it was the one the commands could not reach.
Three commands, and the distinctions between them are the point:
reuse another occurrence of the same drawing. A decision to share,
made on purpose, because sharing discovered later — when an edit
turns up somewhere you did not expect — is the bad version.
duplicate a copy of the drawing, appended, for when what is on screen is
the starting point for the next one.
make unique this occurrence gets a private copy; the others keep sharing.
The undo of reuse, and refused when nothing else uses the
drawing: a copy nobody asked for is a second identical symbol in
the library for no reason a person could see.
Duplicate copies the CONTENT and not the exposure. Its new occurrence is a plain
one-frame hold, not a copy of the source occurrence's transform or corrections,
because those belong to that use of the drawing — carrying them over would make
duplicating a drawing quietly duplicate the treatment of one exposure of it.
A copy is SHALLOW by default and keeps its references to other symbols, so a
head built out of reusable eyes still uses those eyes. `:deep? true` copies
everything it places with new ids throughout. The lane model asks for both and
says why: never promise decoupling while leaving the edited object shared, and
only the deep copy can keep that promise. `bring/symbols` already did the
reachability walk and the id remapping, so the deep copy is that function
pointed at its own clip.
`node/sources` was still being read as a SET at five call sites, each with a
comment about a lane that cuts between several drawings — the keyed source that
no longer exists. An occurrence names one symbol, so they now ask `node/source`,
and `placed-frame` answers with `:symbol` rather than `:of`, which was the last
echo of the retired field name.
To let the commands use `clip/free-id` and the copy machinery, the lane's own
validation moved from `domain/sequence` to `domain/symbol`, which is where it
belonged anyway: a sequence is the one composition rule a node map carries, and
it now sits beside the parent and stencil checks rather than in the namespace
that happens to build lanes. That also breaks the cycle — sequence can require
clip and bring, and nothing below it requires sequence. Preconditions still
check only the LANE's shape: refusing an exposure edit over an unrelated defect
elsewhere in the symbol would be this command answering for a part of the
document it never touches.
The cel strip gains reuse, duplicate and make unique, the last shown only where
the selected exposure actually shares its drawing. Drawing on twos is also now
under test: exposure length is the cadence, the lane's transform has its own
clock, and it still moves on every frame — stepping it would be the cel cadence
leaking into continuous motion.
397 tests, 5,561 assertions. `test/browser/sequence.mjs` drives the three new
commands through the real editor and checks that three exposures are still one
row.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
9446829774